Click here and here if you haven’t been keeping up.
- Beautiful hardware, as always.
- GUI looks awkward. To have the same icon sizes as the iPhone but on a much bigger screen just looks proportionately wrong. Maybe this takes getting used to.
- Why are 3G models an extra $130? That makes no sense to me… a 3G chip costs a few bucks at most. It’s also not like that price tag INCLUDES the cost of the 3G data plan, which has to be paid for on top. Way to bilk the non-educated consumer class.
- Magazines? Newspapers? (NOT just NYT) There’s a lot more to the print world that Apple could come to dominate besides just plain ol’ books
- What’s the point of the more powerful custom built A4 processor without multi tasking? It is just wasteful and downright silly being able to ONLY run a Facebook app in the middle by itself. Being billed as a multimedia machine, it’d be nice to play music in the background or something while reading an ebook. Too many scenarios.
- STILL no flash support? It was stupid of Jobs to demo time.com and disappoint everyone by showing flash still wasn’t supported.
- Google Reader (and RSS readers in general) on the iPad has the potential to be great. I envision an endless scrolling magazine style layout for all your feeds. That, a cup of hot green tea with a dash of honey, and a warm bed sound pretty much perfect.
- iPad over a netbook anyday though. Here’s to hoping this is the death knell of the netbook, which I absolutely abhor. (I give it points for being more hackable than the iPad though)
Thoughts?






Psychological and Physiological Relativity: Fixing the Arbitrary Age Limit Conundrum
The definition of a G
Part of what I want this blog to become is a collection of my random theoretical solutions to real everyday problems… a la synthesis, but not so heavy on abstract rhetoric. Yes, I spend a good chunk of my free time thinking about these type of things. Yes, I thoroughly enjoy it. And no, I don’t care if you think I’m a nerd.
So, fixing the arbitrary age limit conundrum. What I mean by this is the arbitrary age governments set on privileges such as being able to drive, drink alcohol, fight in a war, etc. For example: The United States sets the legal drinking age at 21 even though almost all foreign countries set it at 18, some even 16. The US also sets the age at which one can join the army at 18, which is arguably significantly more dangerous during times of war.
This makes no sense me though, because as Einstein discovered: it’s all relative! No two people are exactly alike. People’s minds and bodies mature at different rates. It’s not uncommon to meet people in their 20’s who you’d swear should still be in high school and vice versa. These differences need to be taken into account.
What I propose, then, are government mandated tests that track both mental and physical development in children. Only once certain criteria are met can these children/teenagers be deemed capable and mature enough to handle driving a car, debate the ramifications of drinking too much alcohol, comprehend what going to war actually means, etc. It’s unlikely the ages would shift that much. I’d say 18 give or take 3 years. But if, say, teenage drivers are that much more mature, resulting in a large drop in teenage car crashes (which are extremely high), then I would consider it a success. It’s all about the results.
There’s virtually zero chance of something like this being implemented though, and I realize that. There’s too much social inertia to overcome. To not be able to compare children just by age would shatter social norms. I’m very curious as to how this kind of system would pan out in an experimental community though…
Some food for thought. Until next time!